|
|
 | 07 maj
04:08 | User talk:Patikornekleri
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://amandabynespornsm.forumcommunity.net Amanda Bynes ← Older revision Revision as of 02:08, 7 May 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I...
stanford.edu |
| 05 maj
04:36 | User talk:Patikornekleri
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http: ← Older revision Revision as of 02:36, 5 May 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize...
stanford.edu |
| 05 maj
04:36 | User talk:Patikornekleri
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about ← Older revision Revision as of 02:36, 5 May 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do...
stanford.edu |
| 01 maj
18:06 | User talk:Patikornekleri
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://7parishiltonnudef.tumblr.com paris hilton nude, ← Older revision Revision as of 16:06, 1 May 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he...
stanford.edu |
| 01 maj
01:16 | User talk:Patikornekleri
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug ← Older revision Revision as of 23:16, 30 April 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support...
stanford.edu |
| 01 maj
01:13 | User talk:Patikornekleri
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' ← Older revision Revision as of 23:13, 30 April 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while...
stanford.edu |
| 30 kw.
21:54 | User talk:Patikornekleri
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange ← Older revision Revision as of 19:54, 30 April 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to...
stanford.edu |
| 28 kw.
22:05 | User talk:Patikornekleri
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo ← Older revision Revision as of 20:05, 28 April 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while...
stanford.edu |
| 28 kw.
22:03 | User talk:Patikornekleri
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and ← Older revision Revision as of 20:03, 28 April 2012 Line 1: Line 1: - I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel...
stanford.edu |
| 
|
